Wind Industry and Governments Violate Nuremberg codes

From Ontario Wind Resistance

It was another late night for West Lincoln residents and their council.
Professor Bigelow presented his study outline and research goals before the Chair, Mayor and council members. Many insightful and poignant questions were put to Professor Bigelow. The gymnasium was filled with over 300 attentive residents who were than given an opportunity to comment on the presentation. Speakers lined up at the microphone and were commenting well past 9 pm.
The overwhelming message… West Lincoln does not want industrial wind turbines in their community.
April 8, 2013
Good Evening Mayor Joyner and Members of Council,
I probably don’t need to introduce myself at this point but I will anyways. My name is Shellie Correia and I live with my family on Elcho Road.
I would like to speak to you tonight about the proposed health study. It is not a study that would be done to truly assess the harm caused by wind turbines – instead it is being done to discredit the victims and to find any possible excuse on which to blame their symptoms. There is no credible way to conduct a study of this sort without having the consent of all individuals involved. You must consent to living near 3 MW wind turbines that are almost 600 feet tall and to answering very personal questions, for the benefit of the wind industry.
The Nuremberg Code was written to protect people from the types of experiments these individuals wish to subject us to. I have brought a copy of the Nuremberg Code, should you wish to see it, to demonstrate how unethical and immoral such a study would be if conducted within our community which is adamantly opposed to wind turbines in our midst.
There were 12 cases that made up the second series of trials in Nuremberg. The first was the United States vs. Karl Brandt et al, commonly referred to as the “Nuremberg Medical Trial. The case started on December 9, 1946 when the
U. S. Chief of Counsel for war crimes, Telford Taylor, delivered the prosecution’s opening statement against the 23 defendants. Twenty of these defendants were physicians. To one degree or another, Taylor charged the defendants with murder torture and other atrocities, all in the name of medical science. In late August of 1947, the judges handed down their ruling. It included the Nuremberg Code and 7 death sentences.
There are 10 requirements in the Nuremberg Code that must be met prior to the conducting and experiments or studies on humans.
Nuremberg Code Item#1:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration and purpose of the ; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. In order to give consent to this experiment, we would have to be willing to live amongst these huge 3 MW wind turbines and we have made it abundantly clear that we are not willing.
It is only the host farmers that have agreed to the wind turbines, because they were offered enormous sums of money. They signed in haste, and will repent at their leisure. And because a gag clause is part of the contract, they have given up their right to complaint or to object. We have not! There are many farmers in this community that turned down huge sums of money because they had the foresight to do the research before signing the contract. They realized that the negatives far outweighed the positives.
Nuremberg Code Item #2:
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
At this time, no proof of benefit has been seen. On the contrary, the negatives far out weight the positives.
Nuremberg Code Item #3:
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
So where are those animal studies? I haven’t been made aware of any.
Nuremberg Code Item #4:
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
People in wind projects all over Ontario are suffering as we speak. No effort has ever been done to rectify or even explore their suffering.
Nuremberg Code Item #5:
No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except perhaps in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
Now isn’t that just more evidence that pro-wind people need to be used in the study?
Nuremberg Code Item #6:
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
We all know that there is need for these turbines. Coal can be replaced by affordable natural gas. We cannot afford this wind energy scam. Turbines are not a solution to any problem. Do your own research and get enlightened. Don’t believe what the wind pushers who stand to make huge amounts of money have to say.
Nuremberg Code Item #7:
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
No respite has ever been made to remove sufferers from their environment. On the contrary, these industrial machines are forced on communities and people who are unable to tolerate them have to pay their own way to get away from them. Those who are unable to sell their homes or pay or alternative lodging are forced to endure their symptoms and suffer. To compound their suffering, the wind industry will then claims that these normally honest intelligent and hardworking people are just liars, hypochondriacs, turbine envying creatures that are all suffering form the Nocebo effect. Preposterous! What is even more believable is that they want us to believe that they as developers as well as the politicians are honest, caring tree-hugging environmentalists who are out to save the world.
Nuremberg Code Item#8:
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
It is not ethical that the wind industry should be involved in any studies – other than as subjects.
Nuremberg Code Item#9:
During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
What option do people have for terminating? There are a whole lot of people out there who would love to know how to go about terminating this experimentation on them and their families. Many people are suffering and this government has outright dismissed their concerns. I wish we could terminate because then we’d have even more homes to provide those pro-wind people who will happily take part in this study.
Nuremberg Code Item#10:
During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability or death to the experimental subject.
How do the scientists propose to stop the experiment? The can only stop studying the people still being forced to endure these machines. It is abundantly clear who needs to be involved in this study. Those people who love their turbines or who say they love turbines but in fact, really just love money, should be involved. Go talk to them about a conducting your study.

2 responses to “Wind Industry and Governments Violate Nuremberg codes

  1. Wind turbines are the biggest joke of this century. They spoil the landscape, are noisy and serve no purpose. We still need coal. They make the greenies happy and the hosts rich. They divide communities and pit neighbour against neighbour. We need 2 stop the inappropriate siting of these turbines and listen 2 the people who are suffering. They r crying out 4 help n no-one cares.

  2. The Nuremberg trials were a kangaroo court vendetta using false evidences against Germans in the aftermath of the WW2. But yes, the principles listed are fair. However these were not adhered to by the prosecutors during those times where tortures were routinely used to extract confessions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s